The Necessity of Reparation for Historic Injustices

A Salty Dog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 12:58 pm new

indo-dreaming wrote:

sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

There's those bloody "elites" again.

Like I said, when you can't find an enemy, invent one.

The right are such a miserable pathetic bunch of do nothing whingers.

burleigh Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:00 pm new

indo-dreaming wrote:

sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

Love the last comment

burleigh Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:01 pm new

A Salty Dog wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:
sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

There's those bloody "elites" again.

Like I said, when you can't find an enemy, invent one.

The right are such a miserable pathetic bunch of do nothing whingers.

Seems the "left" in here are doing all the whinging. Including yourself. If you live an a glass house, don't throw rocks.

A Salty Dog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:05 pm new

sypkan wrote:

it's the same with the ndis

if labor don't take those ridiculous spiralling out of control numbers seriously soon...

they'll soon lose that 'principle' too

Ah yes, the NDIS.

Those out of control spiralling costs are largely due to your fellow taxpayer rorting the system and ultimately you.

Those service providers found to be acting fraudulently , apart from any criminal penalty, be banned from receiving any taxpayer funded benefit such as medicare, PBS etc for life.

indo-dreaming Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:08 pm new

Anyway we now we have a template on how to ensure a referendum doesn't get up.

1. Ensure you dont have bipartisan support, you can do this by not negotiating on the proposal.

2. Ensure you dont have draft legislation in place so people dont understand or trust things.

3. Ensure you cant answers important questions and tell them you will figure those things out after (see number two)

4. Ensure you give as much mixed messages as possible, better still just lie where possible about things people can check and see are not true, ideally you want to have as many different people saying different things present and in the past, so instead of one or two leaders with clear messages have half a dozen with mixed messages.

5. Ensure you have questionable people involved who are on record having said some shady things that are going to spook people, praising communist is good start

6.Insult and call names to those that dont agree with you or question your proposal, racist, chicken littles, bigots, stupid, is a good start and when they bust your lies call them conspiracy theorist, its also important to call anything they say or point out as disinformation.

7. Ensure you have USA celebrities telling Aussies what they should support, cause we always love other's getting involved in our politics especially when they have no idea what its about.

8. Ensure big corporations back you, big business is a must but big sporting bodies and other organisations are good too, everyone loves being told how to think by big corporations.

9. Ensure you have an old washed up pop singer with an old annoying hit that people have already heard ten too many times as your theme song, then make an long advert with no info in it they must endure.

10. Slam your message down peoples throats, with non stop TV advertising, bill boards, TV host, bands, concerts the more the better, guilt trip the fuck out of people until they vote against what you want.

Was trying to keep it to ten, but 11 is important.

11. Make sure the question doesn't reflect the actual thing you are selling, for instance you could bang on about advice and advisory body for a year and then not even have the words advice or advisory body in the question or chapter to be included in the constitution, even better focus on one aspect like recognition when its really more about the aspect not mentioned properly like an advisory body.

After all this, you should get the No result you are after.

A Salty Dog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:10 pm new

burleigh wrote:

A Salty Dog wrote:
indo-dreaming wrote:
sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

There's those bloody "elites" again.

Like I said, when you can't find an enemy, invent one.

The right are such a miserable pathetic bunch of do nothing whingers.

Seems the "left" in here are doing all the whinging. Including yourself. If you live an a glass house, don't throw rocks.

I'm not "left" mate.

Dutto and the boys were complaining about Albo and the crew ignoring more pressing issues such as the cost of living, yet the right are still banging on about the referendum.

soggydog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:15 pm new

indo-dreaming wrote:

sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

Pretty hilarious really. Scomo refused to take responsibility for anything, down to lying to a Royal Commission. Albo takes responsibility and people are calling for his head. Pretty funny what people want when it suits an agenda.

GuySmiley Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:21 pm new

GuySmiley wrote:

#algorithmrabbitholes

Gee wizz what does it take to be quoted as an authority on SN these days? No matter the bullshit as long as the person I’m quoting agrees with me that’s all that matters

#algorithmrabbitholes
#cockwomble
#fuckfacts
#legendinmylunchbox
#mythoughtsaremytruthandreality

A Salty Dog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:19 pm new

soggydog wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:
sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

Pretty hilarious really. Scomo refused to take responsibility for anything, down to lying to a Royal Commission. Albo takes responsibility and people are calling for his head. Pretty funny what people want when it suits an agenda.

And Scomo was Minister for Everything at one stage.

sypkan Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:26 pm new

soggydog wrote:

sypkan wrote:

it's the same with the ndis

if labor don't take those ridiculous spiralling out of control numbers seriously soon...

they'll soon lose that 'principle' too

Aaaah, I think you might find bill shorten already addressed the mismanagement of NDIS funds from the previous government and provided tax payers with quite the saving….. I’m not 100% sure but I think it was to the tune of $750 mill. So even if you subtract the $400 mill from the voice campaign taxpayers could be ahead about $350 mill.

But yeah, Labor has the numbers problem.

it was / is a good start...

the whole thing is fundamentally flawed in it's design, it would take some real self refletoon to accept that...

it is just mindblowing the amount of bureaucracy that came with this beast, along with lack of the most basic of checks and balances

it is beyond unsustainable

still...

garyg1412 Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:26 pm new

burleigh wrote:

Seems the "left" in here are doing all the whinging. Including yourself. If you live an a glass house, don't throw rocks.

Grammar alert Burleigh!! You can't throw rocks. They're too fucking big. It's stones you don't want to be throwing in a glass house.

sypkan Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:40 pm new

A Salty Dog wrote:

sypkan wrote:

it's the same with the ndis

if labor don't take those ridiculous spiralling out of control numbers seriously soon...

they'll soon lose that 'principle' too

Ah yes, the NDIS.

Those out of control spiralling costs are largely due to your fellow taxpayer rorting the system and ultimately you.

Those service providers found to be acting fraudulently , apart from any criminal penalty, be banned from receiving any taxpayer funded benefit such as medicare, PBS etc for life.

getting a bit accusational there salty one

when actually, the opportunities I've resisted...

perfectly legitimate ones (see above)

gawd knows why I bother

the inherent design encourages otherwise...

I should buy some tuning forks and increase my prices to match the premium for 'therapuetic practice'

'research' and 'evidence based' practice of course...

apparently...

but not!

GuySmiley Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:33 pm new

" ... it is just mindblowing the amount of bureaucracy that came with this beast, along with lack of the most basic of checks and balances ..."

Huh?

Want to rephrase that? explain yourself? or are you happy with the inherent contradiction ?

andy-mac Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:34 pm new

A Salty Dog wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:
sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

There's those bloody "elites" again.

Like I said, when you can't find an enemy, invent one.

The right are such a miserable pathetic bunch of do nothing whingers.

Yep Gina, one of the richest individuals on earth carrying on about elites!!

burleigh Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:35 pm new

garyg1412 wrote:

burleigh wrote:

Seems the "left" in here are doing all the whinging. Including yourself. If you live an a glass house, don't throw rocks.

Grammar alert Burleigh!! You can't throw rocks. They're too fucking big. It's stones you don't want to be throwing in a glass house.

Just confirmed with my Geologist wife that you can indeed throw a rock.

sypkan Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:44 pm new

GuySmiley wrote:

" ... it is just mindblowing the amount of bureaucracy that came with this beast, along with lack of the most basic of checks and balances ..."

Huh?

Want to rephrase that? explain yourself? or are you happy with the inherent contradiction ?

what contradiction?

it is possible to have layers and layes of bullshit bureaucracy whilst overlooking the most basic of checks and balances isn't it?

I know it is...

because that's what they did

A Salty Dog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 01:44 pm new

garyg1412 wrote:

burleigh wrote:

Seems the "left" in here are doing all the whinging. Including yourself. If you live an a glass house, don't throw rocks.

Grammar alert Burleigh!! You can't throw rocks. They're too fucking big. It's stones you don't want to be throwing in a glass house.

He just wrote the first thing that came into his head.

GuySmiley Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 02:20 pm new

sypkan wrote:

GuySmiley wrote:

" ... it is just mindblowing the amount of bureaucracy that came with this beast, along with lack of the most basic of checks and balances ..."

Huh?

Want to rephrase that? explain yourself? or are you happy with the inherent contradiction ?

what contradiction?

it is possible to have layers and layes of bullshit bureaucracy whilst overlooking the most basic of checks and balances isn't it?

I know it is...

because that's what they did

true but the language you use there was similar to that used by abbott to sack 100s at the ATO, ASIC and ACCC under the smoke and mirrors excuse of cutting red tape before the Hayne RC into banking and we all know what that found.

soggydog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 02:25 pm new

sypkan wrote:

GuySmiley wrote:

" ... it is just mindblowing the amount of bureaucracy that came with this beast, along with lack of the most basic of checks and balances ..."

Huh?

Want to rephrase that? explain yourself? or are you happy with the inherent contradiction ?

what contradiction?

it is possible to have layers and layes of bullshit bureaucracy whilst overlooking the most basic of checks and balances isn't it?

I know it is...

because that's what they did

Yeah, but Sypkan. Your original post had a tone that is was Labor that was mismanaging the NDIS, when it was actually the LNP. Shorten has cleaned it up to the tune of billions over 4 years. Did you check the link I posted. The saving over 4 years is projected into the billions.

soggydog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 02:27 pm new

sypkan wrote:

GuySmiley wrote:

" ... it is just mindblowing the amount of bureaucracy that came with this beast, along with lack of the most basic of checks and balances ..."

Huh?

Want to rephrase that? explain yourself? or are you happy with the inherent contradiction ?

what contradiction?

it is possible to have layers and layes of bullshit bureaucracy whilst overlooking the most basic of checks and balances isn't it?

I know it is...

because that's what they did

Like Robodebt……….. the hard bit is going to be how you pin that one on Labor.

GuySmiley Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 02:41 pm new

The trouble with the NDIS, aged care and child care costs is the “private “ operators price gouging and general dishonesty, Howard started the privatisation lunacy with child care and aged care and its been a runaway gravy train for spivs ever since … it’s how neoliberalism is supposed to work

indo-dreaming Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 02:43 pm new

A Salty Dog wrote:

indo-dreaming wrote:
sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

There's those bloody "elites" again.

Like I said, when you can't find an enemy, invent one.

The right are such a miserable pathetic bunch of do nothing whingers.

Its pretty clear the majority of people voted based on income/class and not even party lines so much, most of the Yes seats are in areas with high to very high incomes its not a stretch to call this demographic Elites, or all those politicians and academics elites like Marcia & Noel, yeah sure there is many elites in the No camp too and Elites that would have voted No, but there was still a clear pattern based of class on how people voted.

Elite being

"In political and sociological theory, the elite (French: élite, from Latin: eligere, to select or to sort out) are a small group of powerful people who hold a disproportionate amount of wealth, privilege, political power, or skill in a group. Defined by the Cambridge Dictionary"

GuySmiley Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 02:50 pm new

“academics elite”

You mean like the Melb Uni “elite” whose comments you’ve postings????

You simply can’t make shit up like this

#algorithmrabbitholes
#cockwomble
#fuckfacts
#legendinmylunchbox
#mythoughtsaremytruthandreality
#myelitesaren’telite

indo-dreaming Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 03:04 pm new

like i said above

"yeah sure there is many elites in the No camp too and Elites that would have voted No, but there was still a clear pattern based of class on how people voted."

The results of seats where people voted Yes generally supports this.

A Salty Dog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 03:05 pm new

indo-dreaming wrote:

A Salty Dog wrote:
indo-dreaming wrote:
sypkan wrote:

good article...

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/the-devil-in-the-details-ins…

what a shambles

pity there wasn't more of this analysis before...

it's like a closd shop union scenario brought the whole thing down

sealed unit closed shop and hubris...

The comments are much better than the article.

https://i.imgur.com/LkwS7Dq.png

https://i.imgur.com/BiZcoN0.png

There's those bloody "elites" again.

Like I said, when you can't find an enemy, invent one.

The right are such a miserable pathetic bunch of do nothing whingers.

Its pretty clear the majority of people voted based on income/class and not even party lines so much, most of the Yes seats are in areas with high to very high incomes its not a stretch to call this demographic Elites, or all those politicians and academics elites like Marcia & Noel, yeah sure there is many elites in the No camp too and Elites that would have voted No, but there was still a clear pattern based of class on how people voted.

Elite being

"In political and sociological theory, the elite (French: élite, from Latin: eligere, to select or to sort out) are a small group of powerful people who hold a disproportionate amount of wealth, privilege, political power, or skill in a group. Defined by the Cambridge Dictionary"

And they have always been there (as a kid we would call them toffs) and they come from both sides of the political spectrum.

"Elites", like "Wokes" are just terms adopted and bastardised by the right to label others when in need of an enemy.

What's next I wonder?

sypkan Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 03:14 pm new

"Like Robodebt……….. the hard bit is going to be how you pin that one on Labor."

because they designed it

it's their baby

and they are reluctant to admit the fundamental design flaws within it

some of it was acceptable at the start, even inevitale... but they have had 10 years or more now to sort it out, but nohing...

interestingly, I know people deep within it, that advocated for it at the start, even before its conception, and will continue to do so...

but even these people can see it is totally unsustainable, and are quietly screaming for change... silently biding their time, before planning to blow the whistle on the whole thing...

also interestingly, many people did the hard yards in the sector before, on low wages, doing shit jobs - literally... but with the influx of cash, came a heap of blowins and money makers. even some famous footballer was celebrated in the afr for his astute 'investment' and selling on of his business...

literally anyone can move in, set up with no experience, and print money... the only qualification being capital... and those connected to policy makers - from both sides of politics - know this, have been told this...

it's a fucking disaster, attracting all the wrong people

once again, it's intentions were so good, but some very very basic overlooking -bordering on incompetence - has created a monster...

and once again, the sensitive nature of the sector, means questions that should be asked, are swept away and shut down

meanwhile, in darkness...

GuySmiley Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 03:13 pm new

Darn right there salty except once as a community education was valued without question but these days as you correctly suggest it’s been downgraded by weaponised terms like‘elite’ for crass political reasons

indo-dreaming Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 03:43 pm new

Elites is actually a very fair and accurate word to describe these people and majority of Yes seats and its far from a new word or description

Obviously its doesn't mean everyone that voted Yes are elites, or that many elites didn't vote No.

I guess some people like you might not like it, because as a Yes voter you dont like to be lumped in with elites as traditionally the left has not been elite, quite the opposite although the vibe i get here is more of a elite type vibe more a white collar vibe.

Over the last twenty years we have and are seeing a clear change of values in many areas between left and right. almost a complete flip.

Traditionally the right have been the rich and elites, the left the common man and blue collar worker, today though they are not they are the inner city university educated.

You can see this swap in all kind's of areas, for instance Conservatives were always the ones doing the censoring which is now more only religious conservative's, while now its the left who are obsessed with canceling and suppression of views.

BTW. This is actually a problem for LNP as they are losing these high income elite seats, especially too teals and those teals seat's also voted Yes not a good sign for LNP

Unfortunately change is not happening so much the other way and many working class people in the burbs havent woken up to this shift yet , i guess because they take far less interest in politics or social issues so vote more on tradition or habit.

And then you have people stuck in the middle like Sypkan or Blowin etc who have seen the shift and are traditionally leftist (in a positive way) but cant bring themselves to move to the right, Blowin even use to use the term fake left, these are the people that long for the Labor of old.

This vote is interesting because it was far less along party lines and more about class in how people voted to me the results clearly shows the true left and true right. (obviously taking the Aboriginal voter out of things)

Supafreak Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 03:42 pm new

GuySmiley wrote:

The trouble with the NDIS, aged care and child care costs is the “private “ operators price gouging and general dishonesty, Howard started the privatisation lunacy with child care and aged care and its been a runaway gravy train for spivs ever since … it’s how neoliberalism is supposed to work

I would check my mothers unity bill each month and with out fail there would always be some bullshit added costs . Her package from the government gave her $54,000 a year and unity was our aged care provider . Besides the $14,500 annual administration costs they would charge $60 for a 1 hour care worker and pay the workers $27. There were charges per kilometre for distance worker had to travel from previous job but they would also charge for a nurse visit that never happened, this happened on numerous occasions. Very generous from the government $54,000 a year only for private aged care agencies to rort the fuck out of it . Unity was once government run but was privatised like everything else .

A Salty Dog Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 03:47 pm new

Indo

You said

"Elites is actually a very fair and accurate word to describe these people and majority of Yes seats and its far from a new word or description."

You missed the point again.

udo Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 04:29 pm new
gsco Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 04:47 pm new

more pure gold from the AFR:

Enlightenment ideals defeat the identity politics of the discriminatory Voice

"The arguments for the referendum failed because they challenged the fundamental principles of Australia’s liberal democracy and longstanding political culture.

"In the referendum debate, Australia’s Enlightenment liberalism, based on equal citizenship for all and humanitarian respect for the individual, was forced to confront the new culture of identity politics and defeated it.

"Again, only within the ideology of identity politics can it become “racist” to refuse to treat individuals principally as members of a race."

AFR wrote:

Australians need not fear the result of the Voice referendum, nor give undue regard to those who say that it has inflicted lasting damage on reconciliation and on recognition of Indigenous people.

Andrew Breitbart famously said that politics is downstream of culture. That is another way of saying, as John Howard has said, that politics is a battle of ideas. The Voice referendum will be seen in retrospect as a historic battle of ideas with deep meaning for the future of Australia’s liberal democratic culture, and for our national project of giving effect to liberal ideas in our institutions and policy.

In the referendum debate, Australia’s Enlightenment liberalism, based on equal citizenship for all and humanitarian respect for the individual, was forced to confront the new culture of identity politics and defeated it.

Though it may not be evident today, and some bitter words have been spoken, it is evident that the referendum was approached by supporters of both the YES and NO sides with great goodwill towards Indigenous Australians. The goodwill was represented by the over 90 per cent support for the 1967 referendum, and today, inter alia, by the high representation of Australians with Indigenous heritage in the Federal parliament.

A large majority of Australians responded positively to the first proposals for the Voice, before they discovered that the government would refuse bipartisanship, details and coherent argument, forcing them to vote on an issue that challenged their deep belief in equal citizenship.

So, what went wrong? It is now indisputable that the concept of a constitutional Voice failed the most basic tests of principle and practicality in the minds of most voters. How was it that experienced political minds of the government could not address this?

A large part of the answer to this puzzle is the incursion into elite, and especially Labor, culture, of the new Marxism of identity politics, which is increasingly revealing itself as offering fragile support for sound policy and successful politics.

Australia’s liberal democracy and its political culture have been built around three great streams of thought coming from the Enlightenment of the 18th century at the time of the British arrival: the humanitarian belief in the common humanity and dignity of all people; the requirement to govern in the public interest rather than the selfish interests of the powerful few; and the productive and creative power of personal freedom under just laws.

These are the ideas that have fuelled Australia’s emergence as perhaps the most successful and liberal of countries. Argument for the Voice failed to acknowledge, and indeed challenged, each of these fundamental aspects of the nation’s long-standing political culture.

Identity politics is a philosophy that interprets liberal society as divided between exploiting and victim classes. In the 19th and for half of the 20th century, these classes were deemed to be capitalists and proletariat. Today these classes are based on race and gender.

Married with a humanitarian rhetoric, this divisive philosophy treats all Aboriginal people for the purposes of policy as a race, and, almost imperceptibly, has taken hold of the country’s ruling elites. The flaws of this modern version of Marxism, however, damned the Voice as a viable project.

Identity politics explains the government’s failure to make a rational case for the Voice, for identity politics is an ideology, immune from rational dispute, and determinedly blind to contrary ideas. It is an ideology that deplores disagreement and regularly threatens cancellation and censorship through cries of “disinformation”.

To an adherent, it is persuasive simply to name the identity group being privileged. Identity politics misled the government into imagining that the mere fact that Indigenous activists wanted the Voice was an argument in its favour. As most Australians believe, that is no argument at all.

Remarkable advances

Again, only within the ideology of identity politics can it become “racist” to refuse to treat individuals principally as members of a race. Most Australians still believe that it is racist to grant a privilege to one group of citizens over another – on whatever basis, race or indigeneity, matters not.

The campaign made clear that many Australians of Indigenous heritage resented, as an affront to their human dignity and freedom, being treated as identical and uniform when the individuality and diversity of Indigenous Australia is very great, both in heritage and life purposes.

The main issues of gross disadvantage are to be found among the 20 per cent of Aboriginal people in remote communities, not among the 80 per cent living in major cities and towns. The 2021 Census recorded that of 813,000 people identified at that time as having an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ancestry, 516,000 (63 per cent) also noted that they had other ancestries: English, Scots, Irish and many others.

Albanese argued, inaccurately, that previous policy frameworks had failed. In fact, the past half century and more has seen remarkable advances, of which most Australians are aware. The 19th-century betrayal of the Enlightenment promise of equal citizenship has been reversed, the infringements on liberty and dignity of the “Protection” regimes have been abolished, equal citizenship with equal rights has at last been achieved, and the barriers to equal opportunity largely dismantled.

In 1966, the first known Aboriginal university graduates, Margaret Valadian and Charles Perkins, received their degrees. By 2018, there were more than 18,000 Indigenous higher education students.

Australia’s flexible liberal economy had enabled between 12,000 and 16,000 Indigenous-owned businesses to come into existence, with a similar distribution across industry types to non-Indigenous business. More than 25,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were in professional occupations, including some 600 solicitors and a similar number of health practitioners. By 2018, 89 per cent of Indigenous Year 3 students in major cities met or were above national minimum standards in reading and numeracy.

Recognition does not depend on one measure, and it certainly did not depend on a discriminatory Voice. There has already been great recognition of Indigenous Australians, through such advances as the 1962 Electoral Act entrenching the right to vote for all Indigenous Australians, the 1975 Anti-Discrimination Act, and especially the 1993 Native Title Act based on negotiation that finally addressed the dispossession of country for many Indigenous citizens.

Identity politics does not provide the language or social understanding that enables the resolution of disadvantage in a harmonious society. The disharmony caused by the campaign is its true fruit.

Corporate leaders need to see that identity politics is a poor basis for the virtue signalling that has degraded the national debate in recent months. Their freedom in the future depends on the survival of political processes in which all Australians have equal rights and responsibilities. Advocating that would be true virtue.

GuySmiley Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 04:55 pm new

Supafreak wrote:

GuySmiley wrote:

The trouble with the NDIS, aged care and child care costs is the “private “ operators price gouging and general dishonesty, Howard started the privatisation lunacy with child care and aged care and its been a runaway gravy train for spivs ever since … it’s how neoliberalism is supposed to work

I would check my mothers unity bill each month and with out fail there would always be some bullshit added costs . Her package from the government gave her $54,000 a year and unity was our aged care provider . Besides the $14,500 annual administration costs they would charge $60 for a 1 hour care worker and pay the workers $27. There were charges per kilometre for distance worker had to travel from previous job but they would also charge for a nurse visit that never happened, this happened on numerous occasions. Very generous from the government $54,000 a year only for private aged care agencies to rort the fuck out of it . Unity was once government run but was privatised like everything else .

Sad to say that your story wouldn’t be the exception Supa, best not to grow frail :/

Pop Down Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 04:55 pm new

I will point out a worrying trend for me .
Important debates in Australia are becoming progressively grubbier .
Politics has lead the way with the media following very happily .
The USA will split within 10 years .
The Two sides hate each other .
Their ( so called ) Un biased Institutions are now in the contest .

Australia is not like the US !
We have referendums !

I played League and real Football from school to 36 .
Loved a contest and miss it like an old dog .
However !!!!
Life is not like football .
There should be no ( real ) contest between family ( I have 2 daughters who are tough ) , friends and neighbours . Lot's of problems and arguments , no problem . Lot's of give and take .
Listen to PBS 106.6FM 24/7 ( when you're not surfing ) , and don't watch the telly .
And be good to your mums :)

basesix Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 04:57 pm new

haha, are you Kemp, @gsco, or did you work with him at uni? Quite enjoyed A Liberal State, bit broad-brushstoke though.
.

sypkan Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 05:20 pm new

one for reform...

"The Yes campaign was sabotaged from within"

oooooooohh... a conspiracy theory... from the left!

jokes aside...

(jokes?)

why the hell did they use a liberal campaign apparatus?

sypkan Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 05:22 pm new
Pop Down Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 05:22 pm new

No . Went to uni , but didn't work .

basesix Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 05:36 pm new

what went on there? felt like a burger gal reveal.
maybe gsco and pop down are AI and it glitched.

gsco Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 06:19 pm new

what happen to the maths chat basesix?

basesix Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 06:35 pm new

first you must answer there riddles 3 (well, just boring questions really):
are you kemp, have you chatted to optimist, do you have reverence for the hexagon?

andy-mac Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 06:55 pm new

gsco wrote:

more pure gold from the AFR:

Enlightenment ideals defeat the identity politics of the discriminatory Voice

"The arguments for the referendum failed because they challenged the fundamental principles of Australia’s liberal democracy and longstanding political culture.

"In the referendum debate, Australia’s Enlightenment liberalism, based on equal citizenship for all and humanitarian respect for the individual, was forced to confront the new culture of identity politics and defeated it.

"Again, only within the ideology of identity politics can it become “racist” to refuse to treat individuals principally as members of a race."

AFR wrote:

Australians need not fear the result of the Voice referendum, nor give undue regard to those who say that it has inflicted lasting damage on reconciliation and on recognition of Indigenous people.

Andrew Breitbart famously said that politics is downstream of culture. That is another way of saying, as John Howard has said, that politics is a battle of ideas. The Voice referendum will be seen in retrospect as a historic battle of ideas with deep meaning for the future of Australia’s liberal democratic culture, and for our national project of giving effect to liberal ideas in our institutions and policy.

In the referendum debate, Australia’s Enlightenment liberalism, based on equal citizenship for all and humanitarian respect for the individual, was forced to confront the new culture of identity politics and defeated it.

Though it may not be evident today, and some bitter words have been spoken, it is evident that the referendum was approached by supporters of both the YES and NO sides with great goodwill towards Indigenous Australians. The goodwill was represented by the over 90 per cent support for the 1967 referendum, and today, inter alia, by the high representation of Australians with Indigenous heritage in the Federal parliament.

A large majority of Australians responded positively to the first proposals for the Voice, before they discovered that the government would refuse bipartisanship, details and coherent argument, forcing them to vote on an issue that challenged their deep belief in equal citizenship.

So, what went wrong? It is now indisputable that the concept of a constitutional Voice failed the most basic tests of principle and practicality in the minds of most voters. How was it that experienced political minds of the government could not address this?

A large part of the answer to this puzzle is the incursion into elite, and especially Labor, culture, of the new Marxism of identity politics, which is increasingly revealing itself as offering fragile support for sound policy and successful politics.

Australia’s liberal democracy and its political culture have been built around three great streams of thought coming from the Enlightenment of the 18th century at the time of the British arrival: the humanitarian belief in the common humanity and dignity of all people; the requirement to govern in the public interest rather than the selfish interests of the powerful few; and the productive and creative power of personal freedom under just laws.

These are the ideas that have fuelled Australia’s emergence as perhaps the most successful and liberal of countries. Argument for the Voice failed to acknowledge, and indeed challenged, each of these fundamental aspects of the nation’s long-standing political culture.

Identity politics is a philosophy that interprets liberal society as divided between exploiting and victim classes. In the 19th and for half of the 20th century, these classes were deemed to be capitalists and proletariat. Today these classes are based on race and gender.

Married with a humanitarian rhetoric, this divisive philosophy treats all Aboriginal people for the purposes of policy as a race, and, almost imperceptibly, has taken hold of the country’s ruling elites. The flaws of this modern version of Marxism, however, damned the Voice as a viable project.

Identity politics explains the government’s failure to make a rational case for the Voice, for identity politics is an ideology, immune from rational dispute, and determinedly blind to contrary ideas. It is an ideology that deplores disagreement and regularly threatens cancellation and censorship through cries of “disinformation”.

To an adherent, it is persuasive simply to name the identity group being privileged. Identity politics misled the government into imagining that the mere fact that Indigenous activists wanted the Voice was an argument in its favour. As most Australians believe, that is no argument at all.

Remarkable advances

Again, only within the ideology of identity politics can it become “racist” to refuse to treat individuals principally as members of a race. Most Australians still believe that it is racist to grant a privilege to one group of citizens over another – on whatever basis, race or indigeneity, matters not.

The campaign made clear that many Australians of Indigenous heritage resented, as an affront to their human dignity and freedom, being treated as identical and uniform when the individuality and diversity of Indigenous Australia is very great, both in heritage and life purposes.

The main issues of gross disadvantage are to be found among the 20 per cent of Aboriginal people in remote communities, not among the 80 per cent living in major cities and towns. The 2021 Census recorded that of 813,000 people identified at that time as having an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ancestry, 516,000 (63 per cent) also noted that they had other ancestries: English, Scots, Irish and many others.

Albanese argued, inaccurately, that previous policy frameworks had failed. In fact, the past half century and more has seen remarkable advances, of which most Australians are aware. The 19th-century betrayal of the Enlightenment promise of equal citizenship has been reversed, the infringements on liberty and dignity of the “Protection” regimes have been abolished, equal citizenship with equal rights has at last been achieved, and the barriers to equal opportunity largely dismantled.

In 1966, the first known Aboriginal university graduates, Margaret Valadian and Charles Perkins, received their degrees. By 2018, there were more than 18,000 Indigenous higher education students.

Australia’s flexible liberal economy had enabled between 12,000 and 16,000 Indigenous-owned businesses to come into existence, with a similar distribution across industry types to non-Indigenous business. More than 25,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were in professional occupations, including some 600 solicitors and a similar number of health practitioners. By 2018, 89 per cent of Indigenous Year 3 students in major cities met or were above national minimum standards in reading and numeracy.

Recognition does not depend on one measure, and it certainly did not depend on a discriminatory Voice. There has already been great recognition of Indigenous Australians, through such advances as the 1962 Electoral Act entrenching the right to vote for all Indigenous Australians, the 1975 Anti-Discrimination Act, and especially the 1993 Native Title Act based on negotiation that finally addressed the dispossession of country for many Indigenous citizens.

Identity politics does not provide the language or social understanding that enables the resolution of disadvantage in a harmonious society. The disharmony caused by the campaign is its true fruit.

Corporate leaders need to see that identity politics is a poor basis for the virtue signalling that has degraded the national debate in recent months. Their freedom in the future depends on the survival of political processes in which all Australians have equal rights and responsibilities. Advocating that would be true virtue.

You know if writer is carrying on about Marxist, woke, identity politics blah blah that they could be full of shit?

Pop Down Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 07:08 pm new

Mac - I agree .
Anything could be full of shit so I read the article twice .
I removed the words ( and a paragraph ) Marxist , woke and Identity politics the second time .
It's not full of shit , mostly facts imho !

andy-mac Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 07:17 pm new

Pop Down wrote:

Mac - I agree .

Anything could be full of shit so I read the article twice .

I removed the words ( and a paragraph ) Marxist , woke and Identity politics the second time .

It's not full of shit , mostly facts imho !

https://independentaustralia.net/australia/australia-display/the-tragic…

gsco Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 07:24 pm new

andy-mac then you may need to enlighten university humanities departments across the globe with your wisdom that they're full of shit - they're the ones peddling this western Marxist claptrap, as reflected in the voting patterns of the Yes vote: inner city, younger, uni educated (brought up on a steady diet of 3 square meals per day of critical race theory, which is all that's taught nowadays)

basesix:
1. quite possibly nothing is as it seems
2. opti used to be a forums stalwart until the hardline history-denying western Marxists finally broke him by denying the central importance of Christianity and engaging in their typical tribal cancel culture abuse. I was nice to him btw and valued his views.
3. challenge me

indo-dreaming Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 07:28 pm new

gsco wrote:

more pure gold from the AFR:

Enlightenment ideals defeat the identity politics of the discriminatory Voice

"The arguments for the referendum failed because they challenged the fundamental principles of Australia’s liberal democracy and longstanding political culture.

"In the referendum debate, Australia’s Enlightenment liberalism, based on equal citizenship for all and humanitarian respect for the individual, was forced to confront the new culture of identity politics and defeated it.

"Again, only within the ideology of identity politics can it become “racist” to refuse to treat individuals principally as members of a race."

AFR wrote:

Australians need not fear the result of the Voice referendum, nor give undue regard to those who say that it has inflicted lasting damage on reconciliation and on recognition of Indigenous people.

Andrew Breitbart famously said that politics is downstream of culture. That is another way of saying, as John Howard has said, that politics is a battle of ideas. The Voice referendum will be seen in retrospect as a historic battle of ideas with deep meaning for the future of Australia’s liberal democratic culture, and for our national project of giving effect to liberal ideas in our institutions and policy.

In the referendum debate, Australia’s Enlightenment liberalism, based on equal citizenship for all and humanitarian respect for the individual, was forced to confront the new culture of identity politics and defeated it.

Though it may not be evident today, and some bitter words have been spoken, it is evident that the referendum was approached by supporters of both the YES and NO sides with great goodwill towards Indigenous Australians. The goodwill was represented by the over 90 per cent support for the 1967 referendum, and today, inter alia, by the high representation of Australians with Indigenous heritage in the Federal parliament.

A large majority of Australians responded positively to the first proposals for the Voice, before they discovered that the government would refuse bipartisanship, details and coherent argument, forcing them to vote on an issue that challenged their deep belief in equal citizenship.

So, what went wrong? It is now indisputable that the concept of a constitutional Voice failed the most basic tests of principle and practicality in the minds of most voters. How was it that experienced political minds of the government could not address this?

A large part of the answer to this puzzle is the incursion into elite, and especially Labor, culture, of the new Marxism of identity politics, which is increasingly revealing itself as offering fragile support for sound policy and successful politics.

Australia’s liberal democracy and its political culture have been built around three great streams of thought coming from the Enlightenment of the 18th century at the time of the British arrival: the humanitarian belief in the common humanity and dignity of all people; the requirement to govern in the public interest rather than the selfish interests of the powerful few; and the productive and creative power of personal freedom under just laws.

These are the ideas that have fuelled Australia’s emergence as perhaps the most successful and liberal of countries. Argument for the Voice failed to acknowledge, and indeed challenged, each of these fundamental aspects of the nation’s long-standing political culture.

Identity politics is a philosophy that interprets liberal society as divided between exploiting and victim classes. In the 19th and for half of the 20th century, these classes were deemed to be capitalists and proletariat. Today these classes are based on race and gender.

Married with a humanitarian rhetoric, this divisive philosophy treats all Aboriginal people for the purposes of policy as a race, and, almost imperceptibly, has taken hold of the country’s ruling elites. The flaws of this modern version of Marxism, however, damned the Voice as a viable project.

Identity politics explains the government’s failure to make a rational case for the Voice, for identity politics is an ideology, immune from rational dispute, and determinedly blind to contrary ideas. It is an ideology that deplores disagreement and regularly threatens cancellation and censorship through cries of “disinformation”.

To an adherent, it is persuasive simply to name the identity group being privileged. Identity politics misled the government into imagining that the mere fact that Indigenous activists wanted the Voice was an argument in its favour. As most Australians believe, that is no argument at all.

Remarkable advances

Again, only within the ideology of identity politics can it become “racist” to refuse to treat individuals principally as members of a race. Most Australians still believe that it is racist to grant a privilege to one group of citizens over another – on whatever basis, race or indigeneity, matters not.

The campaign made clear that many Australians of Indigenous heritage resented, as an affront to their human dignity and freedom, being treated as identical and uniform when the individuality and diversity of Indigenous Australia is very great, both in heritage and life purposes.

The main issues of gross disadvantage are to be found among the 20 per cent of Aboriginal people in remote communities, not among the 80 per cent living in major cities and towns. The 2021 Census recorded that of 813,000 people identified at that time as having an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ancestry, 516,000 (63 per cent) also noted that they had other ancestries: English, Scots, Irish and many others.

Albanese argued, inaccurately, that previous policy frameworks had failed. In fact, the past half century and more has seen remarkable advances, of which most Australians are aware. The 19th-century betrayal of the Enlightenment promise of equal citizenship has been reversed, the infringements on liberty and dignity of the “Protection” regimes have been abolished, equal citizenship with equal rights has at last been achieved, and the barriers to equal opportunity largely dismantled.

In 1966, the first known Aboriginal university graduates, Margaret Valadian and Charles Perkins, received their degrees. By 2018, there were more than 18,000 Indigenous higher education students.

Australia’s flexible liberal economy had enabled between 12,000 and 16,000 Indigenous-owned businesses to come into existence, with a similar distribution across industry types to non-Indigenous business. More than 25,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were in professional occupations, including some 600 solicitors and a similar number of health practitioners. By 2018, 89 per cent of Indigenous Year 3 students in major cities met or were above national minimum standards in reading and numeracy.

Recognition does not depend on one measure, and it certainly did not depend on a discriminatory Voice. There has already been great recognition of Indigenous Australians, through such advances as the 1962 Electoral Act entrenching the right to vote for all Indigenous Australians, the 1975 Anti-Discrimination Act, and especially the 1993 Native Title Act based on negotiation that finally addressed the dispossession of country for many Indigenous citizens.

Identity politics does not provide the language or social understanding that enables the resolution of disadvantage in a harmonious society. The disharmony caused by the campaign is its true fruit.

Corporate leaders need to see that identity politics is a poor basis for the virtue signalling that has degraded the national debate in recent months. Their freedom in the future depends on the survival of political processes in which all Australians have equal rights and responsibilities. Advocating that would be true virtue.

Good article +1

velocityjohnno Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 07:55 pm new

+2.

Went over to the ABC to get their editorials on what happened and they are on a different planet.

andy-mac Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 07:57 pm new

gsco wrote:

andy-mac then you may need to enlighten university humanities departments across the globe with your wisdom that they're full of shit - they're the ones peddling this western Marxist claptrap, as reflected in the voting patterns of the Yes vote: inner city, younger, uni educated (brought up on a steady diet of 3 square meals per day of critical race theory, which is all that's taught nowadays)

basesix:

1. quite possibly nothing is as it seems

2. opti used to be a forums stalwart until the hardline history-denying western Marxists finally broke him by denying the central importance of Christianity and engaging in their typical tribal cancel culture abuse. I was nice to him btw and valued his views.

3. challenge me

Well you're the one working in a University.
Way I see it, we have a media landscape dominated by Murdoch, who is 100% behind the LNP. Then there is Nine media whose chairman is Peter Costello, again may have a little more sense of balance, but pro LNP all the way. AFR included.
ABC had board stacked by previous conservative govts, and now with all their main presenters ex Murdoch. All pushing IPA , LNP objectives. ABC tries to give impression of balance, but goes harder on Labor pollies than LNP. If a reporter goes hard on LNP such as Michaela Cash, Ita will sack them on spot as happened.
And you say we are being over run with a woke Marxist agenda.
Geez they must be active on tiktok as the only time I hear about the danger of neo Marxist ideas is when I read articles from even more right wing publications such as Quadrant and your comments here.
Anyway I've said enough. Sad time for Australia where we cannot recognise our FNP in the constitution and give them a non binding Voice on how to improve their situation....
But hey keep throwing the shit and misinformation.
Ciao.

basesix Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 08:25 pm new

gsco wrote:

andy-mac then you may need to enlighten university humanities departments across the globe with your wisdom that they're full of shit - they're the ones peddling this western Marxist claptrap, as reflected in the voting patterns of the Yes vote: inner city, younger, uni educated (brought up on a steady diet of 3 square meals per day of critical race theory, which is all that's taught nowadays)

basesix:

1. quite possibly nothing is as it seems

2. opti used to be a forums stalwart until the hardline history-denying western Marxists finally broke him by denying the central importance of Christianity and engaging in their typical tribal cancel culture abuse. I was nice to him btw and valued his views.

3. challenge me

I'm sorry, but without further information, I'm going to peg you as an intelligent person with a cultural or fundamental disconnect. Generally, you sound like one of my international students, trying to work out how this all works here, overlaying their own weird theory and squashing everything to fit. It is quite sweet in the real world. But takes some discussion.

intriguing, but you are officially denied meaningful engagement with me, due to duplicitous fogging. It is a shame, though this is a surf site, I had hope for you here, gsco. I wish you well, and hope you find challenge in the world you have created.

sypkan Monday, 16 Oct 2023 at 08:11 pm new

velocityjohnno wrote:

+2.

Went over to the ABC to get their editorials on what happened and they are on a different planet.

we all know what planet...

just had an in depth discussion with a voice advocate mate... said exactly the same thing!

their 'analysis' requres some analysis...

Join the conversation Sign up for free OR Login