Cricket chat
ahh the Kelpie.
Also well known for their not-so-subtle ball tampering skills.
southernraw wrote:
Yours or theirs TS!!?? hehe
Morning all.
Starky looking sharpy!
Morning ‘Tubby Taylor’ Captain of the Swellnet 11.
Looking like a good day of cricket, much fun, driven by your fine self.
Can I please be our keeper/opener, a role I had in my teens for City Cricket Club in Geelong in the 1970’s , please, please, skipper ? AW
So long as Kelpie stays at silly point, the field is yours AW!
haha
Btw that's a pretty prestigious honour. Geelong opener. Yew!
Great stuff.
I still think they blew it not bowling half an hour last night. Indians could easily get settled after half hour here.
basesix wrote:
automatic wickie, AW.
Basesix. Beautiful morning mate.
. Ah, very good, AW ( automatic wickie) or awful wicket keeper
We need a run of a few quick wickets, that’ll get the game going and the crowd will find its voice. AW
southernraw wrote:
I still think they blew it not bowling half an hour last night. Indians could easily get settled after half hour here.
Agree, skipper. AW
think you're onto something, AW. I reckon if we get them out, we might have this!
Who is carrying the drinks for the Swellnet 11 ? Exxotixjuices. AW
southernraw wrote:
Fair to say Marnus is the Kelpie!
Doesn’t stop yapping, always chasing balls too wide of the pitch, often sat down on his backside, licking his own. AW
I'm heading west at sparrow fart on thursday myself, AW.. you coming through this way, or going through the guts, via horsham and the grampians?
Been beautiful bowling. Zero luck so far.
I didn't realise Cummins sent Lyon in first thing this morning to bat.
Is he off his head?? What on earth would be the benefit of that.
Terrible captaincy.
Out first ball i think @base.haha.
Wasted 4 overs out of the day in the changeover.
haha all you have to do is comment and a wicket drops.
And Captain Cummins has redeemed himself to me.
What a great captain!! (apologies skipper!...skipper knows best)
I reckon @stu is controlling the matrix..
maybe another 8 posts before lunch @stu..
basesix wrote:
I'm heading west at sparrow fart on thursday myself, AW.. you coming through this way, or going through the guts, via horsham and the grampians?
Basesix. Hi mate. The old Ballarat, Horsham Bordertown route, quickest . Surf forecast is good for our arrival, it’s good there today. AW
@stu put the kibosh on india by simply posting on this thread, it was uncanny. then he lost the charm by invoking the Keanu.
Did he play a role in Kohli's dismissal? If so, we can forgive the Keanu reference.
haha @stu. better to have whammy'd and lost it, than never to have whammy'd at all..
(actually, are you getting them fours now..?)
That was out everyday of the week.
Looked out with naked eye too.
Bloody umpries!
Cooked us again with their terrible call.
Geez last person i'd be trying to fire up in the Australian team is our premium pace bowler.
Looking forward to Starc firing some bouncers in at Jaiswal.
Let 'em think they're in the run race instead of batting for a draw.
That umpiring non decision could realistically cost Australia the whole series. It was a pivotal moment in the game to get rid of the scoring batsman.
If it's a draw, and Sydney is mostly rained out....
The DRS technicalities cooked us too.
the thing I don't get.. bails aside.. not being transparent re the % aside..
Clearly a ball must have to hit the stumps minimum of 50% horizontal AND 50% vertical... and if it is 80% horizontal, and 45% vertical it's not-out.. weird. I'd have thought aggregating the two measures would make sense once it is past, say 20% in both...
southernraw wrote:
That umpiring non decision could realistically cost Australia the whole series. It was a pivotal moment in the game to get rid of the scoring batsman.
If it's a draw, and Sydney is mostly rained out....
The DRS technicalities cooked us too.
Correct skipper. How is it that all public viewers, TV and Radio commentators all say that was clearly out and yet the DRS guy sees it entirely different.
Just like the non bump ball yesterday that was clearly an edge off the bat.
If we are going to use technology, get it right or don’t use it at all. Go back to the old days regarding umpiring decisions. AW
Yep agreed @base and @AW.
They tried to use the argument that the bails aren't included because they're rounded....but so are the bloody top of the stumps!
Sounds like a rule was made on the fly!
This game deserves a result. It's been a classic.
You'd hate to think an umpiring (non) decision affects the whole game and series.
haha, reckon that NZ griptec spray Rishabh just used would work on a board? could solve the pad vs wax conundrum..
https://griptecsport.com/
(they've got a pop-up on their site for people in india)
.